Modernization of General Education 

meeting the changing needs of our students for the evolving workforce

Michigan State University is transforming its general education curriculum to better prepare students for the evolving workforce, emphasizing vertical learning, experiential education, and undergraduate research.

On Dec. 17, 2024, President Kevin Guskiewicz announced the development of a Modern General Education Curriculum as one of his Presidential Initiatives. This project, led by the Office of the Provost, will be steered by faculty as stated in the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees.

Today’s students challenge us to offer an education that will best prepare them to meet current and future workforce needs. To that end, a committee of our world-class faculty and administrative units and  leaders will lead this development of a modern general education curriculum following a thorough review.

Discover more below. 

Provost's Charge

Timeline

A black lantern hangs off the side of a building on MSU's campus foregrounded by white blossoming bunches of flowers.

The General Education Council (GEC)

GEC members will complete the Modern General Education project in three phases.

  • Phase 1 – Fall 2025 through Spring 2026: information-gathering, campus feedback, and research 
  • Phase 2 – Fall 2026: curriculum design 
  • Phase 3 – Spring 2027: campus feedback and academic governance review and approval  
Updated Timeline

Leadership for Modernization of General Education (MGE)

General Education Council (GEC) 

This project will be steered by faculty as stated in the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees: “The institution looks to the faculty for recommendations [...] on the development of new academic programs and modification or discontinuance of old...” (Article 8). The General Education Council members were nominated by the deans and by the University Council on Undergraduate Education (UCUE).

Project Charter

  • Natasha Jones, Co-Chair, College of Arts and Letters  
  • Jonathan Weaver, Co-Chair, College of Social Science  
  • Megan Donahue, College of Natural Science  
  • Euihark Lee, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources  
  • Marci Mechtel, College of Nursing  
  • Sara D. Miller, MSU Libraries  
  • Ken Prouty, College of Music    
  • Jennifer Schmidt, College of Education  
  • John Spink, Broad College of Business  
  • Alexandrea Thrubis Stanley, College of Communication Arts and Sciences   
  • Sarah Tomasik, College of Veterinary Medicine  
  • S. Patrick Walton, College of Engineering  
  • Matt Zierler, James Madison College  
  • Stephen Thomas, Office of Undergraduate Education 

GEC Ex-officio Members 

Permanent members of the GEC are the Provost, the Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education, the Director of AACC/Project Lead, and the Project Manager for AACC, all of whom are ex-officio; they have a voice but no vote.

The current administrators filling these roles are below.

  • Laura Lee McIntyre, Provost   
  • Amy Hertel, EVP and Senior Advisor to the Provost
  • Mark Largent, Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education   
  • Stacia Moroski-Rigney, Project Lead and Assistant Provost, Office of Accreditation, Assessment, Curriculum, and Compliance (AACC)
  • Elizabeth Elliott, AACC Project Manager   

Themed Committees (TCs)

Work by the six TCs began in late October 2025. Faculty, staff, and students are leading research work and making recommendations to the GEC.

GEC Liaison

John Spink  

Membership

Stephen Esquith, Bree Holtz, Megan Dean and Kevin Miloshoff 

Research Question

Should a modern gen ed curriculum at MSU include an ethics requirement? Should MSU include an ethics component as a graduate requirement? If so, how? 

GEC Liaisons

Euihark Lee and S. Patrick Walton 

Membership

Michele (MJ) Jackson, Michael Ristich, Sebnem Onsay, Marcos (Danny) Caballero, Jana Burke, Walter Hawthorne, Sarah Freye

Research Question

How should Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and future generative technologies be addressed in a modern general education curriculum? 

GEC Liaison

Marci Mechtel

Membership

Cheryl Caesar, Jean Tsao, Seven Mattes, Elizabeth Tinsley Johnson, Phillip Strong, Holly Wright

Research Question

What is the intersection of health, environment and global systems (One Health) as it applies to a modern undergraduate general education curriculum. 

GEC Liaison

Matt Zierler 

Membership

Russell Lucas, Beth Judge, Senta Goertler, Saroopa Taylor, Fayyaz Hussain, Alyssa Morley

Research Question

What are the trends, better practices, ways of knowing, and opportunities for MSU undergraduate students to experience and develop global and cross-cultural proficiencies within a modern general education curriculum? 

GEC Liaison

Amy Hertel

Membership

Abriana Cardenas, Renee Miller Zientek, Elyse Aurbach, Charles Jackson III, Sara Barnwell, Laura Wise, Terence Brown, Sarah Rohlfs, Andrea Hoagland, Becky Keogh

Research Question

To explore equitable trends, better practices, and emerging opportunities to inform the design of a modern general education curriculum that supports multiple student pathways including incoming K–12 students, transfer students, and returning/adult learners. 

GEC Liaisons

Jen Schmidt and Jonathan Weaver

Membership

Jane Zimmerman, Laura Jones-Pettit, Richard Bellon, Sandy Burnley, Saul Beceiro-Novo, Kari Schueller Lopez, and Stephanie Brewer

Research Question

What are better practices in general education research, including first- and second-year experiences, high-impact practices (HIPs), accessibility studies, cocurricular and extracurricular learning, assessment, and what are the current trends? How should these better practices influence MSU’s strategy around gen ed development? 

In early spring 2026, all TCs will present their response to the research question, national trends, peer comparisons, and MSU-specific insights, considerations and dilemmas in a short handout for the General Education Committee. Stay tuned for those assets in the Spring. 

Campus Community Groups (CCGs)

Facilitated by a GEC member, the CCGs perform three key services across the Listening Phase of the project and beyond: 

  1. Create dialog and gather feedback  
  2. Ensure transparency and documentation
  3. Maintain consistent engagement

In short, the CCGs function as channels to systematically collect and disseminate information to key stakeholders to support positive change across campus.  

GEC Liaison

Ken Prouty

Contacts

Teresa Cuellar (Academic Governance Secretary) and Heidi Pineda 

GEC Liaison

Sara Miller

Members

Senta Goertler, Julie Linquist, Stephen Thomas, Michael Lockett, Hannah Brodhead, Danielle DeVoss, Joyce Meier, Brent Donnellan, Ellen Moll, Brandy Ellison, Karen Moroski-Rigney, Lynmarie Posey, Morgan Shipley 

GEC Liaison

Megan Donahue

Contacts

COGS, UCGS, the Graduate School 

GEC Liaison

Natasha Jones

Members

Gabe Ording, Crystal VanKooten, Brandy Ellison, Garth Sabo, and Jeff Schenker 

GEC Liaison

Stephen Thomas

Members

Amy Martin, Renata Opoczynski, Renee Miller Zientek 

GEC Liaisons

Alexandrea Stanley and Sarah Tomasik

Contacts

Amy Martin, Maria O’Connell, Renata Opoczynski, Jillian Volpe White (UE), Danah Lee, Tony Pham (ASMSU), Shannon Brecheisen and Sonja Fritzsche (CUED), Charles Jackson and the Transfer Student Advisory Board 

We thank the many volunteers and nominees who are making a difference in the project! 

 

How We Work Together

Review the below role description document that clarifies who does what in the project, how we collaborate, and who is responsible for specific actions. We include the Governance bodies who will approve the new, modern, inclusive, global curriculum. This information improves the project effectiveness by enhancing productivity, reducing confusion, and streamlining decision-making. 

Project Roles

 

MGE Engagement

Lead and Inspire at MSU

Faculty, staff, students, and alumni will have many opportunities to contribute to the design of the Modern General Education Curriculum. Submit your comment, question, suggestion, or request for a conversation below.

Submission Form

Thank You for Your Insights!

Provost’s Encouragement 


Laura Lee McIntyre

Thank you for your enthusiastic support for this initiative. We hear it clearly in you calling the General Education Committee Members “visionaries and pragmatists,” and urging us to do better (Friday, August 22, 2025).

Advisor Viewpoints


Bethany Judge, Advisor, Director of Experiential Learning, Undergraduate Education

Your student-first perspectives added to our known set of problem statements in meaningful ways, as you pointed out the credit issues some students encounter. Yours was one of the earliest voices to advocate for transfer students (Friday, August 29, 2025).

Amanda Idema, Assistant Dean, Engineering

You brought to everyone’s attention the administrative and technical hurdles some current general education requirements create for students, as well as how the current complexities in the rules make it difficult to explain the requirements to students and parents (Friday, August 29, 2025).

Kristy Chene, Director of Undergraduate Student Affairs, College of Education

Your comments surfaced the challenges in communicating the value of general education to students, especially our new students. You noted misaligned credits, confusion from so many choices, and duplication as problems others regularly experience (Friday, August 29, 2025).

Value of Data


Bethan Cantwell, Assistant Provost, Institutional Research 

Thank you for helping us see into the numbers, the trends over time, and the grades. With your help, the data became useful information to the audience. We especially appreciated you taking us to the IR dashboards and inviting us to your trainings (Friday, September 5, 2025).

In Service to Students


Mark Largent, Vice Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Education 

Thank you for working with the committee as they prepare for the design phase of a possible new general education curriculum.  We appreciate how you have helped us explore the opportunities and challenges of creating a general education curriculum that is coherent and consistent while being flexible to evolving needs and the many different needs of our students.  We heard you when you told us that MSU and its students need a “consilient curriculum that catalyzes people and prepares them for the future” (Friday, September 5, 2025).

Media Training Overview


Sydney Hawkins, Director of Public Relations, University Communications

You helped us step up our game when we encounter the media or want to share information with our colleagues. Don’t feel pressured, avoid jargon, and prepare for difficult questions was some of your excellent advice.  We were left thinking about opportunities, as you encouraged us to do (Friday, September 12, 2025)

Experts in Integrative Studies


Brandy Ellison, Center Director, Integrative Studies, Social Science

Because of your remarks, we are bearing in mind the highly talented faculty who are held to exacting standards when teaching general education content. Thank you for speaking up about the value of high-impact practices, smaller class sizes, and innovative curriculum design and teaching methods from your Center (Friday, September 19, 2025).

Gabe Ording, Center Director, Integrative Studies, General Science

We learned about the essential considerations related to general education, as well as the ongoing changes and moments of innovation over the years. The current mission of CISGS is to foster scientific literacy among MSU undergraduates and strives to innovate year after year. (Friday, September 19, 2025).

Garth Sabo, Center Director, Integrative Studies Arts & Humanities

Some of us were very moved by your passionate depictions of what general education does for thousands and thousands of our students every year, invoking Bela Hubbard current data on employers’ desired skills, and the importance of creativity (Friday, September 19, 2025).

Crystal VanKooten, First Year Writing Director 

Grounded in research, first-year writing (FYW) helps students develop ‘writerly’ habits for both budding writers and new Spartans alike through encouraging student expression. By its very nature, FYW is inclusive and welcomes diverse perspectives, while serving as a gateway to student success (Friday, September 26, 2025).

Jeff Schenker, Mathematics Department Chair

Focused on diverse student needs, Math 101 and Math 102 avoids a one-size-fits all approach to general education. As the others also indicated, we heard more about sustainability issues and challenges of large class sizes (Friday, September 26, 2025).

Peer Institution Success with New General Education Curriculum


Randy Smith, Vice Provost for Academic Programs, The Ohio State University

We appreciated hearing your story about what happened at OSU, now in your fourth year of implementation! Your encouragement to be optimistic and stay the course mattered to many on the team (Friday, October 3, 2025).

Meg Daly, Associate Dean of Undergraduate Education, The Ohio State University

Your pointers about how implementation and monitoring is happening at OSU helped us see more about what is possible in the future. We heard about navigating course fulfillment, and bookends too, as well as your inventive approaches with credits and themes. (Friday, October 3, 2025)

Some History of General Education at MSU


Cara Cilano, Professor, Department of English

You engaged us with your experiences at MSU and UNC Wilmington. You urged us to do the hard work of defining the purpose of General Education as the GEC sees it, and you featured the Boyer Report and the value of Backwards Design. We were particularly interested in your work in the 21st Century Learning Report that featured High-Impact Practices and a first-year seminar. Finally, your history lesson about our Land Grant mission gave us a new context to understand its importance. (Friday, October 17, 2025) 

Another Peer Institution Success


Andy Perrin, formerly Professor, Sociology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Your enthusiasm for this important work was infectious. The “Ideas in Action” themes resonated with the team. The practical realities, unexpected challenges, and necessary compromises you described will help us prepare for our own. Your input about capstone experiences as an often-overlooked strategy will ensure we do not overlook them. We appreciated how you elevated creativity and discomfort as key parts of the curriculum you helped to design (Friday, October 24, 2025) 

Contact Us

Send an email to

A green 3D printed spartan helmet sits in between the metal feet of the Hannah statue on MSU's campus.

Feedback Sessions

Stay tuned! 

Updates on what we learned will be posted here.

DateAudienceTime
Oct. 13Faculty/Staff4 – 5 p.m.
Oct. 13Faculty/Staff5 – 6 p.m.
Oct. 14Faculty/Staff9 – 10 a.m.
Oct. 15Faculty/Staff9 – 10 a.m.
Oct. 20Faculty/StaffNoon – 1 p.m.
Oct. 21Faculty/Staff10 – 11 a.m.
Oct. 21Faculty/Staff5 – 6 p.m.
Oct. 21Students6 – 7 p.m.
Oct. 22Faculty/StaffNoon – 1 p.m.
Oct. 22Students4 – 5 p.m.
Oct. 22Students6 – 7 p.m.

 

News & Updates

MSU president talks curriculum changes

Read more

MSU president outlines new student success, research initiatives at investiture ceremony

Read more

Announcement of General Education Council

Read more